- #Final cut pro vs premiere full#
- #Final cut pro vs premiere pro#
- #Final cut pro vs premiere software#
- #Final cut pro vs premiere mac#
I even went back and re-exported the file to make sure that all my settings were in place – including checking off ‘Use Maximum Render Quality’, but still I had the same poor results. It was blocky, over compressed, and even the colors seemed a bit off.
#Final cut pro vs premiere pro#
On a recent project of mine though, I noticed that when using my standard H.264 settings in Adobe Premiere Pro the result of the final product didn’t look quite right. This was especially true up until one of the more recent FCP X updates which seemed to have improved the render and output performance noticeably… But nonetheless because of this difference in speed I got into a habit of compressing my long format video files with Premiere or Adobe Media Encoder (even if I was cutting in FCP X), simply because it was faster. While my preference for straight up editing has largely leaned towards FCP X, I also use Premiere Pro all the time which led me to notice that exports from Premiere Pro generally seemed to be faster than exports from FCP X. Like many filmmakers today, I use a number of different NLE’s and post tools on a daily basis as every project has different needs and requirements. There have been certain settings that have worked really well for me over the years with regards to H.264 compression, but it wasn’t until this year that I noticed a staggering difference in the final quality of the files that I would output from Premiere Pro as opposed to FCP X.
#Final cut pro vs premiere mac#
However, if you're not sure about using a Mac for video creation all the time (which is understandable), or think you might want to try learning other programs in the future, it is a good option.I’ve always been really picky when it comes to compressing my video files (especially for web), because the image quality of the final product can be made or broken at this stage. are also provided, which is really nice in terms of learning new ways to make content.)Įven though I can't speak much for Final Cut, I think Creative Cloud is really versatile, but I do agree about the payment.
![final cut pro vs premiere final cut pro vs premiere](https://s.studiobinder.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Final-Cut-Pro-or-Adobe-Premiere-Apple-Motion-1024x520.jpg)
(Flash, Animate, Photoshop, Illustrator, etc. Plus, the Creative Cloud allows you to learn a bunch of different types of content creation, so you decide you'd like to branch out to, say, motion/graphic design, that's already available to you.
#Final cut pro vs premiere software#
Ever since then, I've gotten to learn the more in-depth stuff Premiere offers, and I ended up being able to have a really smooth workflow while learning tricks with the software that really helped the quality of my content. I moved over to Premiere a little over a year ago from iMovie as well, and it had a learning curve, but I was able to get the basics down with the program in just a few days. Premiere has almost never broken for me, and I like how easy it is to use while still being really powerful. I've used Premiere and demoed FCPX for a little bit, and I got very used to Premiere and how smooth it felt to use (even on a last-gen i5 MacBook). The Creative Cloud is great because you get access to all of Adobe's Programs, not just the video editing stuff. I think it depends on whether you'd like to branch out and learn more types of content creation and software. I think Premiere is more expensive than that in a single year.
#Final cut pro vs premiere full#
It's also nice that I paid £200 like seven years ago and I have the full program. I believe the BBC news editors primarily use FCPX because it's simply just faster.
![final cut pro vs premiere final cut pro vs premiere](https://cdn.educba.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ADOBE-PREMIERE-VS-FINAL-CUT-PRO.jpg)
There's a reason it is industry standard in film. Oh, and audio tracks can only be edited to the frame. And the audio compressor on CS5 would put your entire audio track out of sync by two frames. I think before CC you couldn't change an audio track from stereo to mono unless you removed any track of it from the timeline first, as mono and stereo couldn't coexist for some reason. Premiere feels closed and restrictive, especially with audio.
![final cut pro vs premiere final cut pro vs premiere](https://mixkit.imgix.net/videos/preview/mixkit-basketball-court-with-players-top-view-34283-0.jpg)
I've lost so much work to Premiere crashing over the years), and it just feels more open and freeing. FCPX may not be industry standard for film, but it feels a hell of a lot faster to edit with, there are more effects and generators which are handy for YTers, the titles aren't complete anus, it saves literally every thing you do so you never lose any work (lost count of the times Premiere has crashed, only to find that its paltry autosave didn't want to do anything for over an hour when it was set to save every five minutes. I've been using FCPX basically since it came out, and Premiere for work for the last five or so years.